Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-35877

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(410) 571-9860

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 32,525,946 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of May 5, 2015 (which includes 1,370,197 shares of unvested restricted common stock).

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are subject to risks and uncertainties. For these statements, we claim the protections of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in such Sections. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives. When we use the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “continue,” “intend,” “should,” “may” or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Investors are cautioned against placing undue reliance on such statements. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (our “2014 Form 10-K”) that was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and include risks discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other periodic reports that we file with the SEC. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, may be forward-looking:

- i -

Table of Contents

Forward-looking statements are based on beliefs, assumptions and expectations as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors,

- ii -

Table of Contents

may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

The following discussion is a supplement to and should be read in conjunction with our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

- iii -

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- iv -

Table of Contents

PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 and DECEMBER 31, 2014

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

- 2 -

Table of Contents

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

- 3 -

Table of Contents

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

- 4 -

Table of Contents

HANNON ARMSTRONG SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2015

Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (“the Company”) provides debt and equity to the energy efficiency and renewable energy markets. The Company and its subsidiaries are hereafter referred to as “we,” “us,” or “our.” We refer to the financings that we hold on our balance sheet as our “Portfolio.” Our Portfolio may include:

We finance our business through cash on hand, borrowings under our credit facility, and various asset-backed securitization transactions and equity issuances. We also generate fee income through asset-backed securitizations, by providing broker/dealer services and by servicing assets owned by third parties. Some of our subsidiaries are special purpose entities that are formed for specific operations associated with financing sustainable infrastructure receivables for specific long term contracts.

In April 2013, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”). Concurrently with the IPO, we completed a series of transactions, which are referred to as the formation transactions, that resulted in Hannon Armstrong Capital, LLC (the “Predecessor”), the entity that operated the historical business prior to the consummation of the IPO, becoming our subsidiary. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “HASI.” See Note 11 for a summary of our public offerings of common stock.

We elected and qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2013. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income to the extent that we annually distribute all of our taxable income to stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT. We operate our business through, and serve as the sole general partner of, our Operating Partnership subsidiary, Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure, L.P, (the “Operating Partnership”) which was formed to acquire and directly or indirectly own the Company’s assets. We also intend to operate our business in a manner that will continue to permit us to maintain our exception from registration as an investment company under the 1940 Act.

Real Estate Acquisitions

In May 2014, we entered into a Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to acquire all of the outstanding member interests in American Wind Capital Company, LLC (“AWCC”) from Northwharf Nominees Limited, DBD AWCC LLC, NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P. and C.C. Hinckley Company, LLC in exchange for approximately $106.7 million (the “Purchase Price”), which we funded from the use of our cash on hand and our existing credit facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we agreed to a working capital adjustment of approximately $0.2 million, which reduced the Purchase Price and net working capital amounts.

The unaudited pro forma summary for the three months ended March 31, 2014 presents the consolidated results as if the acquisition was completed on January 1, 2013. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what our actual results of operations would have been for the period indicated, nor does it purport to represent our estimate of future results of operations.

- 5 -

Table of Contents

Since the AWCC transaction, we have completed several smaller transactions for a total consideration of $19.4 million, which we funded from the use of our cash on hand and our existing credit facilities. We did not assume any indebtedness in connection with these transactions.

Through these acquisitions and additional land purchases, we expanded our portfolio of assets, to include more than 12,500 acres of land with land leases to over 20 solar projects, which we have recorded in our financial statements as real estate, and the rights to payments from land leases for a diversified portfolio of 57 wind projects, which we have recorded in our financial statements as financing receivables.

We accounted for our acquisitions as business combinations and incurred approximately $2.5 million of acquisition related costs, which we have previously expensed as acquisition costs in our consolidated statement of operations. We recorded the acquired assets (including real estate related intangibles) at fair value. We used a qualified appraiser to assist us with the determination of the fair value estimates for the majority of these assets. We expect to finalize the purchase price allocation for one of our small acquisitions during the second quarter of 2015. There were no liabilities assumed in connection with these acquisitions.

The purchase price allocation for our acquisitions, which reflects our estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired, is as follows:

As a result of these acquisitions, we have recorded rental income of $2.1 million and interest income of $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

Investment in Equity Method Affiliate

In October 2014, we made a $144 million investment in Strong Upwind Holdings LLC (“Strong Upwind”), a newly formed joint venture that we own with an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co (“JP Morgan”). Strong Upwind purchased JPMorgan’s minority interest in four limited liability holding companies that own ten operating wind projects across five states. Each of the four holding companies is controlled and operated by a large wind energy company. The minority ownership interests in the holding companies are structured in a typical wind partnership flip structure where Strong Upwind, along with a number of other large institutional investors receive a pre-negotiated preferred return consisting of a priority distribution of the project cash flows along with tax attributes. Once this preferred return is achieved, the partnership “flips” and the holding company receives the majority of the cash flow and the institutional investors will have an on-going residual interest. We share in the cash flow and tax attributes of Strong Upwind according to a negotiated schedule. After factoring in the various ownership interests, we own between 4% and 17.5% of the holding companies based on voting percentages. We have determined that we do not have a controlling voting interest in Strong Upwind and therefore we account for our investment using the equity method. See Note 13 for additional information.

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for the periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in our annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted. Certain amounts in the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Following the guidance for non-controlling interests in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation, references in this report to our earnings per share and our net income and shareholders’ equity attributable to common shareholders do not include amounts attributable to non-controlling interests.

Financing Receivables

Financing receivables include financing sustainable infrastructure project loans, receivables and direct financing leases.

Unless otherwise noted, we generally have the ability and intent to hold our financing receivables for the foreseeable future and thus they are classified as held for investment. Our ability and intent to hold certain financing receivables may change from time to time depending on a number of factors, including economic, liquidity and capital conditions. The carrying value of financing receivables held for investment represents the present value of the note, lease or other payments, net of any unearned fee income, which is recognized as income over the term of the note or lease using the effective interest method. Financing receivables that are held for investment are carried, unless deemed impaired, at cost, net of any unamortized acquisition premiums or discounts and including origination and acquisition costs, as applicable. Financing receivables that we intend to sell in the short-term are classified as held-for-sale and are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value on our balance sheet. The proceeds from sales are recorded as an operating activity in our statement of cash flows based on our intent at the time of purchase. We may secure nonrecourse debt with the proceeds from our financing receivables.

We evaluate our financing receivables for potential delinquency or impairment on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or other conditions warrant such an evaluation. When a financing receivable becomes 90 days or more past due, and if we otherwise do not expect the debtor to be able to service all of its debt

- 7 -

Table of Contents

or other obligations, we will generally consider the financing receivable delinquent or impaired and place the financing receivable on non-accrual status and cease recognizing income from that financing receivable until the borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to pay contractual amounts due. If a financing receivable’s status significantly improves regarding the debtor’s ability to service the debt or other obligations, we will remove it from non-accrual status.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

A financing receivable is also considered impaired as of the date when, based on current information and events, it is determined that it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contracted terms. Many of our financing receivables are secured by sustainable infrastructure projects. Accordingly, we regularly evaluate the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and value of the underlying project, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower, its sponsors or the obligor as well as any guarantors. We consider a number of qualitative and quantitative factors in our assessment, including, as appropriate, a project’s operating results, loan-to-value ratios and any cash reserves, the ability of expected cash from operations to cover the cash flow requirements currently and into the future, key terms of the transaction, the ability of the borrower to refinance the transaction, other credit support from the sponsor or guarantor and the project’s collateral value. In addition, we consider the overall economic environment, the sustainable infrastructure sector, the effect of local, industry, and broader economic factors, the impact of any variation in weather and the historical and anticipated trends in interest rates, defaults and loss severities for similar transactions.

If a financing receivable is considered to be impaired, we record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the financing receivable to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the financing receivable’s contractual effective rate or the amount realizable from other contractual terms such as the currently estimated fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. We charge off financing receivables against the allowance when we determine the unpaid principal balance is uncollectible, net of recovered amounts.

Investments

Investments include debt securities that meet the criteria of ASC 320, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities. As a result of the sale of certain debt securities previously designated as held-to-maturity in 2014, we have designated our debt securities as available-for-sale and will carry these securities at fair value on our balance sheet from that date. Unrealized gains and losses, to the extent not considered other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”), on available-for-sale debt securities are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) in equity on our balance sheet. Previously, we recorded our debt securities as held-to-maturity and thus had carried these securities on the balance sheet at amortized cost, which was initially at cost plus any premiums or less any discounts that are amortized or accreted from or into investment interest income using the effective interest method.

We evaluate our investments for OTTI on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. Our OTTI assessment is a subjective process requiring the use of judgments and assumptions. Accordingly, we regularly evaluate the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the financial and operating performance and value of the underlying project. We consider a number of qualitative and quantitative factors in our assessment. We first consider the current fair value of the security and the duration of any unrealized loss. Other factors considered include changes in the credit rating, performance of the underlying project, key terms of the transaction and support provided by the sponsor or guarantor.

To the extent that we have identified an OTTI for a security and intend to hold the investment to maturity and we do not expect that we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis, we recognize only the credit component of OTTI in earnings. We determine the credit component using the difference between the securities’ amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows, discounted using the effective interest method or its estimated collateral value. Any remaining unrealized loss due to factors other than credit, or the non-credit component, is recorded in accumulated OCI.

To the extent we hold investments with an OTTI and if we have made the decision to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis, we recognize the entire portion of the impairment in earnings.

Premiums or discounts on investment securities are amortized or accreted into investment interest income using the effective interest method.

- 9 -

Table of Contents

Real Estate

Real estate reflects land or other real estate held on our balance sheet. Real estate intangibles reflect the value of associated lease intangibles, net of any amortization. In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired in a business combination with in-place leases is allocated to (i) the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land or other real property such as buildings, and (ii) the identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the value of other acquired intangible assets, based in each case on their fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements, if any, based on the determination of the fair values of these assets. The as-if-vacant fair value of a property is determined by management based on an appraisal of the property by a qualified appraiser.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as intangible assets based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease, including renewal periods reasonably assured of being exercised by the lessee. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income. We also record, as appropriate, an intangible asset for in-place leases. The value of the leases in place at the time of the transaction is equal to the potential revenue (rent and expenses) lost if the leases were not in place (during downtime) and that would be incurred to obtain the lease. The amortization is calculated over the initial term unless management believes that it is reasonably assured that the tenant would exercise the renewal option, whereby we would amortize the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off.

We record the purchases of real estate, other than in a business combination (i.e. real estate with no in-places leases), as asset acquisitions that are recorded at cost, including acquisition and closing costs.

Our real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance, repairs and capital expenditures. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (if any) are charged to operations as incurred. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis, unless there is considerable risk as to collectability, so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis and is recorded in other assets.

Securitization of Receivables

We have established various special purpose entities or securitization trusts for the purpose of securitizing certain financing receivables or other debt investments. We determined that the trusts used in securitizations are variable interest entities, as defined in ASC 810, Consolidation. We typically serve as primary or master servicer of these trusts; however, as the servicer, we do not have the power to make significant decisions impacting the performance of the trusts. Based on an analysis of the structure of the trusts, under U.S. GAAP, we have concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary of the trusts as we do not have power over the trusts’ significant activities. Therefore, we do not consolidate these trusts in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

We account for transfers of financing receivables to these securitization trusts as sales pursuant to ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, as the transferred receivables have been isolated from the transferor (i.e., put presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership) and we have surrendered control over the transferred receivables. When we sell receivables in securitizations, we generally retain minor interests in the form of servicing rights and residual assets, which we refer to as securitization assets.

Gain or loss on the sale of receivables is calculated based on the excess of the proceeds received from the securitization (less any transaction costs) plus any retained interests obtained over the cost basis of the receivables sold. For retained interests, we generally estimate fair value based on the present value of future expected cash flows using our best estimates of the key assumptions of anticipated losses, prepayment rates, and current market discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.

- 10 -

Table of Contents

We initially account for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value and subsequently measure such servicing assets and liabilities using the amortization method. We assess servicing assets for impairment at each reporting date. If the amortized cost of servicing assets is greater than the estimated fair value, we will recognize an impairment in net income.

Servicing income is recognized as earned. Servicing assets and liabilities are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income, and are periodically assessed for impairment.

Our other retained interest in securitized assets, the residual assets, are classified as available-for-sale securities and carried at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets in Other Assets. We generally do not sell our residual assets. Our residual assets are evaluated for impairment in a similar manner as described under “Investments” above.

Interest income related to the residual assets is recognized using the effective interest rate method. If there is a change in expected cash flows related to the residual assets, we calculate a new yield based on the current amortized cost of the residual assets and the revised expected cash flows. This yield is used prospectively to recognize interest income.

Modifications to Debt

We evaluate any modifications to our debt in accordance with the applicable guidance in ASC 470-50, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments. If the debt instruments are substantially modified, the modification is accounted for in the same manner as a debt extinguishment (i.e., a major modification) and the fees paid are recognized as expense at the time of the modification. Otherwise, such fees are deferred and amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the remaining term of the modified debt instrument using the interest method.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include short-term government securities, certificates of deposit and money market funds, all of which had an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. These securities are carried at their purchase price, which approximates fair value.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes cash and cash equivalents set aside with certain lenders primarily to support deferred funding and other obligations outstanding at the balance sheet dates.

Variable Interest Entities and Equity Method Investment in Affiliate

We account for our investment in entities that are considered variable interest entities under ASC 810. We perform an ongoing assessment to determine the primary beneficiary of each entity as required by ASC 810. See Securitization of Receivables above.

Substantially all of the activities of the special purpose entities that are formed for the purpose of holding our financing receivables and investments on our balance sheet are closely associated with our activities. Based on our assessment, we determined that we have power over and receive the benefits of these special purpose entities; hence, we are the primary beneficiary and should consolidate these entities under the provisions of ASC 810.

As described in Note 1, in October 2014, we made a $144 million investment in Strong Upwind that is jointly owned with an affiliate of JPMorgan. We own 50% of the voting stock of Strong Upwind. Based on our assessment, we have determined that Strong Upwind is a voting interest entity and that we have the ability to exercise influence over its operating and financial policies and as such we account for the investment using the equity method. We share in the cash flow and tax attributes of Strong Upwind according to a negotiated schedule.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

Strong Upwind purchased JPMorgan’s minority interest in four limited liability holding companies that own ten operating wind projects across five states. Each of the four holding companies is majority owned and operated by a large wind energy company. Based on our assessment, we have determined that each of the holding companies are a variable interest entity and that we have the ability to exercise influence over operating and financial policies of the holding companies, but we are not the primary beneficiary as we do not have the power to direct the most important decisions related to the most significant activities of the investment. After factoring in the various ownership interests, we own between 4% and 17.5% of the holding companies based on voting percentage. Thus we do not consolidate either Strong Upwind or the holding companies, but account for them using the equity method of accounting as described below.

Under the equity method of accounting, the carrying value of our equity method investments is determined based on amounts we invested, adjusted for the equity in earnings or losses of investee allocated based on the partnership agreement, less distributions received. Because the partnership agreements contain preferences with regard to cash flows from operations, capital events and liquidation, we reflect our share of profits and losses by determining the difference between our “claim on the investee’s book value” at the end and the beginning of the period. This claim is calculated as the amount we would receive (or be obligated to pay) if the investee were to liquidate all of its assets at recorded amounts determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and investors in accordance with their respective priorities. This method is commonly referred to as the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (“HLBV”). Intra-company gains and losses are eliminated for an amount equal to our interest and are reflected in the share in loss from equity method investment in affiliate in the consolidated statements of operations. Cash distributions received from our equity method investments are classified as operating cash flows to the extent of cumulative HLBV earnings. Any additional cash flows are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing cash flows.

We evaluate the realization of our investment accounted for using the equity method if circumstances indicate that our investment is OTTI. OTTI impairment occurs when the estimated fair value of an investment is below the carrying value and the difference is determined to not be recoverable. This evaluation requires significant judgment regarding, but not limited to, the severity and duration of the impairment; the ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery; financial condition, liquidity, and near-term prospects of the issuer; specific events; and other factors. Based on an evaluation of our equity method investment, we determined that no impairment had occurred for three months ended March 31, 2015.

Income Taxes

We elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2013. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we currently distribute at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our shareholders. We intend to continue to meet the requirements for qualification as a REIT. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on that portion of net income that is currently distributed to our owners. However, our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) will generally be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes as well as taxes of foreign jurisdictions, if any.

We account for income taxes of our TRS using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted.

We apply accounting guidance with respect to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements. This guidance requires the accounting and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing our tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more likely than not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. We are required to analyze all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, which includes U.S. federal and certain states. We have no examinations in progress, none are expected at this time, and years 2010 through 2014 are open. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had no uncertain tax positions. Our policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of other expense. There was no accrued interest and penalties as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and no interest and penalties were recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

- 12 -

Table of Contents

Equity-Based Compensation

At the time of completion of our IPO, we adopted our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”), which provides for grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, shares of restricted common stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights, long-term incentive-plan units (“LTIP units”) and other restricted limited partnership units issued by our Operating Partnership and other equity-based awards. From time to time, we may award unvested restricted shares as compensation to members of our senior management team, our independent directors, employees, advisors, consultants and other personnel under our 2013 Plan.

We recorded compensation expense for stock awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. We recognize compensation expense for unvested shares that vest solely based on service conditions on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant, adjusted for forfeitures. For awards where the vesting is contingent upon achievement of certain performance targets, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period (which includes the performance period) based on our estimate of the achievement of the various performance targets, adjusted for forfeitures. Our share price at the date of grant and actual performance results at the end of the performance period determine the fair value and the number of shares that will ultimately be awarded. The award earned is generally between 0% and 150% of the initial target, depending on the extent to which the performance target are met. If minimum performance targets are not attained, no awards will be awarded.

Earnings Per Share

We compute earnings per share of common stock in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to controlling stockholders (after consideration of the earnings allocated to unvested shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period excluding the weighted average number of unvested shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units (“participating securities” as defined in Note 12). Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to controlling stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period plus other potentially dilutive securities. No adjustment is made for shares that are anti-dilutive during a period.

Segment Reporting

We provide and arrange debt and equity financing for sustainable infrastructure projects and report all of our activities as one business segment.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. The updated standard becomes effective for us beginning in the quarter ending March 31, 2017. We have not yet selected a transition method, and we are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosure.

Compensation – Stock Compensation

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which amends and updates the guidance in ASC 718, as it relates to the accounting for awards with performance conditions that affect vesting after the service. The amendment provides explicit accounting guidance for when an employee is

- 13 -

Table of Contents

eligible to retire or otherwise terminate employment before the end of the period in which a performance target (for example, an initial public offering or a profitability target) could be achieved and still be eligible to vest in the award if and when the performance target is achieved. The amendment is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period and is to be applied either retrospectively to all existing performance targets outstanding or prospectively for all awards granted or modified after the effective date, with early application permitted. We are evaluating the new standard, but do not at this time expect this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value accounting guidance provides a three-level hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. The levels of inputs used to determine the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities carried on the balance sheet at fair value and for those which only disclosure of fair value is required are characterized in accordance with the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements. Where inputs for a financial asset or liability fall in more than one level in the fair value hierarchy, the financial asset or liability is classified in its entirety based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of that financial asset or liability. We use our judgment and consider factors specific to the financial assets and liabilities in determining the significance of an input to the fair value measurements. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, only our residual assets (described in Note 5), financing receivables held-for-sale and investments available-for-sale, if any, were carried at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Unless otherwise discussed below, fair value is measured using a discounted cash flow model, contractual terms and Level 3 unobservable inputs which consist of base interest rates and spreads over base rates which are based upon market observation and recent comparable transactions. An increase in these unobservable inputs would result in a lower fair value and a decline would result in a higher fair value.

- 14 -

Table of Contents

Financing Receivables and Investments

The fair value of financing receivables and investments is measured using a discounted cash flow model, contractual terms and Level 3 unobservable inputs. For investments held at fair value, we used a range of interest rate spreads of 2% to 5% based upon comparable transactions. The financing receivables held for sale are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

During 2014 as part of our portfolio management process, we sold an investment designated as held-to-maturity. As a result, we have transferred all of our remaining investments in debt securities to investments available-for-sale at fair value. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for our Level 3 investments that are carried at fair value following the transfer of our investments to available-for-sale:

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

Our financial statements may include non-recurring fair value measurements related to acquisitions, if any. Assets acquired in a business combination are recorded at their fair value. We use third party valuation firms to assist us with developing our estimates of fair value. These valuations are prepared using Level 3 inputs.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are principally cash and cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had cash deposits held in U.S. banks of $80 million and $70 million, respectively. Included in these balances are $77 million and $66 million in bank deposits, respectively, in excess of amounts federally insured.

Financing receivables, investments and leases consist of primarily U.S. federal government-backed receivables, investment grade state and local government receivables and receivables from various sustainable infrastructure projects and do not, in our view, represent a significant concentration of credit risk. See Note 6 for an analysis by type of obligor.

- 15 -

Table of Contents

Non-Controlling Interest in Consolidated Entities

Units of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP units”) that are owned by other limited partners are included in non-controlling interest on our consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2015 the Operating Partnership had 28,235,160 OP units outstanding; of which we owned 99% and other limited partners owned 1% or 284,992 OP units. The outstanding OP units held by outside limited partners are redeemable for cash, or at our option, for a like number of shares of our common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we exchanged 46,290 OP units held by our non-controlling interest holders for the same number of shares of our common stock. The non-controlling interest holders are generally allocated their prorate share of income and equity transactions.

The following summarizes certain transactions between us and the securitization trusts:

In connection with securitization transactions, we typically retain servicing responsibilities and residual assets. In certain instances, we receive annual servicing fees ranging from 0.05% to 0.20% of the outstanding balance. Included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets are our servicing assets at amortized cost and our residual assets at fair value. Our residual assets are subordinate to investors’ interests, and their values are subject to credit, prepayment and interest rate risks on the transferred financial assets. The investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to our other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. In computing gains and losses on securitizations, we use the same 8% discount rate we use for the fair value calculation of residual assets, which is determined based on a review of comparable market transactions.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our managed assets totaled $2.6 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, of which $1.8 billion and $1.7 billion were securitized assets in the respective periods. There were no securitization credit losses in the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014, and no material securitization delinquencies as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Based on the nature of the receivables and experience-to-date, we do not currently expect to incur any credit losses on the receivables sold.

As of March 31, 2015, our Portfolio included approximately $885 million of financing receivables, investments, real estate and equity method investments on our balance sheet. The financing receivables and investments are typically collateralized contractually committed debt obligations of government entities or private high credit quality obligors and are often supported by additional forms of credit enhancement, including security interests and supplier guaranties. The real estate is typically land and related lease intangibles for long-term leases to sustainable infrastructure projects with high credit quality obligors. The equity method investment represents our investment in a partnership that holds minority equity investments in wind projects.

- 16 -

Table of Contents

The following is an analysis of our Portfolio by type of obligor and credit quality as of March 31, 2015, with 98% of the debt and real estate portion of our Portfolio rated investment grade as shown below:

The components of financing receivables as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were as follows:

In accordance with the terms of certain financing receivables purchase agreements, payments of the purchase price is scheduled to be made over time, generally within twelve months of entering into the transaction, and as a result, we have recorded deferred funding obligations of $72 million and $88 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. We have $1.6 million and $3.0 million in restricted cash as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which will be used to pay these funding obligations.

The following table provides a summary of our anticipated maturity dates of our financing receivables and investments and the weighted average yield for each range of maturities as of March 31, 2015:

- 17 -

Table of Contents

The components of our real estate portfolio as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were as follows:

The real estate related intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms with expirations dates that range between the years 2047 and 2061 assuming expected extensions. There are conservation easement agreements covering two of our properties that limit the use of the property upon expiration of the respective leases. As of March 31, 2015, the future amortization expense of these intangible assets is as follows:

Our real estate is rented under long term land lease agreements with expiration dates that range between the years 2033 and 2044 under the initial terms and 2047 and 2061 assuming anticipated extensions by the lessees. As of March 31, 2015, the future minimum rental income under our land lease agreements is as follows:

In 2013, we recorded an allowance of $11.0 million on the remaining $11.8 million balance of a $24 million loan to a wholly owned subsidiary of EnergySource to be used for a geothermal project. During 2014, we agreed to cap our recovery at $2 million in exchange for the ability to realize a portion of the proceeds from the sale of land held by EnergySource and thus we charged off $9.8 million of the receivable against the allowance resulting in a remaining allowance of $1.2 million. In April 2015, we entered into an agreement where we agreed to allow EnergySource to borrow against a pending land sale from an unrelated third party in exchange for a $0.4 million cash payment and an agreement to receive an additional $0.4 million upon the closing of the land sale. Thus, we expect our final recovery from the land sale to equal the net balance of $0.8 million. However, there can be no assurance as to the actual timing or ultimate recovery from any land sale or whether any land sale will in fact occur. The project is considered a variable interest entity and the maximum exposure to loss as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is the net balance of $0.8 million, which represented our estimate of the realizable sale value of assets and was the average balance for the respective period, net of the allowance. No interest income was accrued

- 18 -

Table of Contents

or collected in cash on the loan for the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014. Certain of our executive officers and directors own an indirect minority interest in EnergySource following the distribution of the Predecessor’s ownership interest prior to our IPO.

We had no other financing receivables, investments or leases on nonaccrual status as of March 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. There was no provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014. We did not have any loan modifications that qualify as trouble debt restructurings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014.

In July 2013, we entered into a $350 million senior secured revolving credit facility through newly-created, wholly-owned special purpose subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”). The terms of the credit facility are set forth in the Loan Agreement (G&I) (the “G&I Loan Agreement”) and the Loan Agreement (PF) and related amendments as described below (the “PF Loan Agreement”, and together with the G&I Loan Agreement, the “Loan Agreements”).

Since that time, we have entered into a number of amendments intended to increase the flexibility and borrowing capability of the credit facility as described below:

We have guaranteed the obligations of the Borrowers under each of the Loan Agreements pursuant to (x) a Continuing Guaranty, dated July 19, 2013, and (y) a Limited Guaranty, dated July 19, 2013. As part of our August and December 2014 amendments, we entered into amended and restated versions of these guaranties.

- 19 -

Table of Contents

The Loan Agreements, as amended, provide for senior secured revolving credit facilities with total maximum advances of $1.35 billion (i) in the case of the G&I Loan Agreement, in the principal amount of $100 million to be used to leverage certain qualifying government and institutional financings entered into by us, with maximum total advances (without giving effect to prepayments or repayments) of $300 million, and (ii) in the case of the PF Loan Agreement, in the principal amount of $400 million to be used to leverage certain qualifying project financings entered into by us, with maximum total advances (without giving effect to prepayments or repayments) of $1.05 billion. The $400 million is subject to being reduced to $350 million as described above in the April 2015 amendment. The scheduled termination date of each of the Loan Agreements is July 19, 2019. Loans under the G&I Loan Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.50% or, under certain circumstances, the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.50%. Loans under the PF Loan Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.50% or, under certain circumstances, the Federal Funds Rate plus 2.50%, or a specifically negotiated rate on certain loans as approved by the administrative agent. Under the PF Loan Agreement, we also have the option to borrow at a fixed rate of interest until the expiration of the credit facility in July 2019. The fixed rate is determined by agreement with the Administrative Agent and is based on the prevailing US SWAP rate of an equivalent term to the average-life of the fixed rate portion of the borrowing plus an agreed upon margin.

Any financing we propose to be included in the borrowing base as collateral under the Loan Agreements is subject to the approval of the administrative agent in its sole discretion. As part of the December 2014 amendment, we agreed to pay a placement fee of $20,000 for each financing added to the borrowing base after the date of the amendment. The amount eligible to be drawn under the Loan Agreements for purposes of financing such investments will be based on a discount to the value of each investment or an applicable valuation percentage. Under the G&I Loan Agreement, the applicable valuation percentage for non-delinquent investments is 80% in the case of a U.S. federal government obligor, 75% in the case of an institutional obligor or a state and local obligor, and with respect to other obligors or in certain circumstances, such other percentage as the administrative agent may prescribe. Under the PF Loan Agreement, the applicable valuation percentage is 67% or such other percentage as the administrative agent may prescribe. The sum of approved financings after taking into account the valuation percentages and any changes in the valuation of the financings in accordance with the Loan Agreements determines the borrowing capacity, subject to the overall facility limits described above.

We had outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities of approximately $321 million and $316 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. We pledged approximately $463 million and $422 million of financing receivables as collateral for the credit facility as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The weighted average short-term borrowing rate of our credit facilities was 2.4% as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. We incurred approximately $11 million of costs associated with the Loan Agreements that have been capitalized (included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets) and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Loan Agreements. On each monthly payment date, the Borrowers shall also pay to the administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders, certain availability fees for each Loan Agreement equal to 0.50%, divided by 360, multiplied by the excess of the available borrowing capacity under each Loan Agreement over the actual amount borrowed under such Loan Agreement.

Each Loan Agreement contains terms, conditions, covenants, and representations and warranties that are customary and typical for a transaction of this nature. The Loan Agreements contain various affirmative and negative covenants, and limitations on the incurrence of liens and indebtedness, investments, fundamental organizational changes, dispositions, changes in the nature of business, transactions with affiliates, use of proceeds and stock repurchases.

Each Loan Agreement also includes customary events of default, including the existence of a default in more than 50% of underlying financings. The occurrence of an event of default may result in termination of the Loan Agreements, acceleration of amounts due under both Loan Agreements, and accrual of default interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% in the case of the G&I Loan Agreement and at a rate of LIBOR plus 5.00% in the case of the PF Loan Agreement.

The Loan Agreements require that we maintain the following financial covenants:

- 20 -

Table of Contents

We were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Loan Agreements at each reporting date that such covenants were applicable.

Asset-Backed Nonrecourse Notes

In December 2013, through certain of our subsidiaries, we issued in a private placement $100 million of nonrecourse asset-backed Notes (the “Notes”) with a fixed interest rate of 2.79%. The Notes mature in December 2019 and are secured by certain of our financing receivables included on our balance sheet. The Noteholders can only look to the cash flows of the pledged financing receivables to satisfy the Notes and we are not liable for nonpayment by the obligor of the financing receivables securing these Notes. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had approximately $90 million and $92 million, respectively, of Notes outstanding, which were secured by approximately $104 million and $104 million, respectively, of our financing receivables included on our balance sheet. Upon maturity, the Notes are anticipated to have an outstanding debt balance of approximately $57 million. The Notes may be prepaid prior to December 2018, with a make-whole payment calculated as the present value of remaining principal and interest payments using a discount rate equal to the comparable-maturity treasury yield plus 50 basis points. After December 2018, the Notes may be prepaid at par. At maturity, we will have the option to rollover the remaining debt with a mutually agreed term and rate or repay the outstanding balance.

In October 2014, through certain of our subsidiaries, we entered into a $115 million nonrecourse asset-backed loan agreement (the “ABS Loan Agreement”) with a fixed interest rate of 5.74%. The ABS Loan Agreement matures in September 2021. Principal and interest is paid quarterly starting in March 2015 with a minimum principal payment amount equal to one-half percent (0.5%) of the principal amount of the loan plus additional principal payments based on available cash flow and a target debt balance. HAT Holdings II LLC, an indirect TRS subsidiary of the Company, has pledged its 100% ownership of the equity in HA Wind LLC which in turn has pledged all of its assets, which consists primarily of a 50% ownership interest in Strong Upwind, as security for the loan. The loan is otherwise non-recourse to the Company. The expected remaining debt balance to be repaid at the maturity date is approximately $20 million. The ABS Loan Agreement contains terms, conditions, covenants, and representations and warranties from HA Wind LLC that are customary and typical for a transaction of this nature, including limitations on the incurrence of liens and indebtedness, investments, fundamental organizational changes, dispositions, changes in the nature of business, transactions with affiliates, use of proceeds and stock repurchases. The ABS Loan Agreement also includes customary events of default, the occurrence of which may result in termination of the Loan Agreement, acceleration of amounts due, and accrual of default interest at a rate of 7.74%.

We incurred approximately $2 million of costs associated with our asset-backed nonrecourse debt that have been capitalized (included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets) and is being amortized using the effective interest method over the respective term.

Other Nonrecourse Debt

We have other nonrecourse debt that was used to finance certain of our financing receivables for the term of the financing receivable. Amounts due under nonrecourse notes are secured by financing receivables with a carrying value of approximately $95 million and $108 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and there is no recourse to our general assets. Debt service payment requirements, in a majority of cases, are equal to or less than the cash flows received from the underlying financing receivables.

- 21 -

Table of Contents

Analyses of other nonrecourse debt by interest rate are as follows:

The stated minimum maturities of nonrecourse debt as of March 31, 2015, were as follows:

Litigation

We are not currently subject to any legal proceedings that are probable of having a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2013. As a REIT, we are not subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of net income that is currently distributed to our owners. However, our TRS will generally be subject to federal, state, and local income taxes as well as taxes of foreign jurisdictions, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities for our TRS are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

We recorded a tax benefit/(expense) of $0.0 million and $(0.1) million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to the activities of our TRS. The income tax benefit and expenses recorded were determined using a federal rate of 35% and a combined state rate, net of federal benefit, of 5%. We have recorded a deferred tax liability in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other on our consolidated balance sheet of $0.1 million related to the activities of our TRS as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

- 22 -

Table of Contents

Dividends and Distributions

Our board of directors declared the following dividends in 2014 and 2015:

We completed the following public offerings of common stock:

Registration Statements

Resale Shelf Registration Statement

In August 2014, we filed a registration statement with the SEC registering the resale, from time to time, by certain persons of up to 3,178,410 shares of common stock, comprised of: (1) 1,741,238 shares of common stock issued in connection with our formation transactions at the time of our IPO, (2) 331,282 shares of common stock issuable upon exchange of OP units issued in connection with our formation transactions, which are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis, into cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock and (3) 1,105,890 shares of common stock granted under the 2013 Plan to our directors, officers and other employees.

The registration of the resale of these shares does not necessarily mean that all or any of these shares will be offered or sold by the holders. We have not and will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares by the selling stockholders. Brokerage commissions and similar costs related to the future sale of these shares, if any, will be borne by the selling stockholders.

Company Shelf Registration Statement

In August 2014, we filed a registration statement with the SEC registering the possible offering and sale of up to $500 million of any combination of our common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, and warrants and rights (collectively referred to as the “securities”). We may offer the securities directly, through agents, or to or through underwriters. Sales of the securities may be made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the NYSE or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. The specific terms of the securities offering and the names of any underwriters involved in the sale of the securities will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Our equity offerings starting in October 2014 were completed using this shelf registration.

Awards of Shares of Restricted Common Stock under our 2013 Plan

Under the 2013 Plan, we have issued both awards with service conditions and awards with performance conditions. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, our board of directors awarded employees and directors 174,585 shares of restricted common stock that vest in 2015 to 2019 and 390,131 shares of restricted common stock to certain employees that vest upon the achievement of certain performance targets. We recognize compensation expense as described in Note 2.

- 23 -

Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded $2.2 million and $0.5 million of equity-based compensation expense, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation expense related to awards of shares of restricted common stock is $16.4 million as of March 31, 2015, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average term of approximately two years. The calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate up to 5%.

A summary of the unvested shares of restricted common stock that have been issued is as follows:

12. Earnings per Share of Common Stock

Net income or loss figures are presented net of income or loss attributable to the non-controlling OP units in the earnings per share calculations. The non-controlling limited partners’ outstanding OP units have also been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation attributable to common stockholders as there would be no effect on the amounts since the limited partners’ share of income would also be added back to net income. The weighted average number of OP units attributable to the non-controlling interest was 325,110 and 361,414 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Any shares of common stock which, if included in the diluted earnings per share calculation, would have an anti-dilutive effect have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, there were 1,520,286 and 605,815 shares of unvested restricted common stock outstanding, respectively.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows:

- 24 -

Table of Contents

13. Equity Method Investment in Affiliate

Strong Upwind

As described in Notes 1 and 2, in October 2014, we made a $144 million investment in Strong Upwind that is jointly owned and operated with an affiliate of JPMorgan. We account for our investment using the equity method of accounting and have elected to recognize earnings from these investments one quarter in arrears to allow for the receipt of financial information. For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we have recognized a loss of $0.1 million from our equity method investment in Strong Upwind.

The following is a summary of the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the holding companies, accounted for using the equity method:

14. Subsequent Events

For a discussion of subsequent events occurring after March 31, 2015, see Note 11 relating to our follow on offering of common stock, Note 6 relating to our recovery from our EnergySource loan and Note 7 relating to our credit facility amendment.

- 25 -

Table of Contents

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless specifically stated otherwise or the context otherwise indicates, references to “we,” “our,” “us,” and “HASI” refer to Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., a Maryland corporation, Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure, L.P., and any of our other subsidiaries. Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership of which we are the sole general partner and to which we refer in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as our “Operating Partnership.”

Hannon Armstrong Capital, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, the entity that operated our historical business prior to the consummation of our IPO and which we refer to as the “Predecessor,” became our subsidiary upon consummation of our IPO. To the extent any of the financial data included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is as of a date or from a period prior to the consummation of our IPO, such financial data is that of the Predecessor. The financial data for the Predecessor for such periods do not reflect the material changes to the business as a result of the capital raised in the IPO including the broadened types of projects undertaken, the enhanced financial structuring flexibility and the ability to retain a larger share of the economics from the origination activities. Accordingly, the financial data for the Predecessor is not necessarily indicative of our results of operations, cash flows or financial position following the completion of the IPO.

The following discussion is a supplement to and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and with our 2014 Form 10-K, that was filed with the SEC.

Our Business

We provide debt and equity financing to the energy efficiency and renewable energy markets. We focus on providing preferred or senior level capital to established sponsors and high credit quality obligors for assets that generate long-term, recurring and predictable cash flows. Since our IPO in April 2013 through March 31, 2015, we completed more than $1.6 billion of financing and investment transactions.

Our management team has extensive industry knowledge and experience having completed its first renewable energy financing over 25 years ago and its first energy efficiency financing over 15 years ago. We have deep and long-standing relationships in the markets we target with leading energy service providers, manufacturers, project developers and owners. We originate many of our transactions through programmatic finance relationships with global energy service providers, such as Honeywell International, Ingersoll-Rand, Johnson Controls, Schneider Electric, Siemens, SunPower and United Technologies as well as a number of U.S. utility companies. Since our IPO, a new group of public companies who own and operate renewable energy projects, referred to as YieldCos, has emerged and added additional financing opportunities, in addition to the existing utility-scale renewable energy independent power producers. We also rely on relationships with a variety of key financial participants, including institutional investors, private equity funds, senior lenders, and investment and commercial banks, as well as leading intermediaries, to complement our origination and financing activities. We believe we are the leading provider of financing for energy efficiency projects for the U.S. federal government, the largest property owner and energy user in the United States.

We focus our investment activities primarily on:

- 26 -

Table of Contents

We may also provide financing solutions for other sustainable infrastructure projects, such as water or communications infrastructure, that improve water or energy efficiency, increase energy system resiliency, positively impact the environment or more efficiently use natural resources.

Our goal is to invest in assets that generate long-term, recurring and predictable cash flows or cost savings that will be more than adequate to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders. The cash flows or cost savings are generally generated from proven technologies that minimize performance uncertainty, enabling us to more accurately predict project cashflow over the term of the financing or investment. We provide capital through debt financings and a variety of preferred and common equity structures with a preference for structures in which we hold a senior or preferred position in the capital structure.

In April 2013, we completed our IPO, raising net proceeds of approximately $160 million. We have raised approximately $210 million in three follow on public offerings, including $81 million in a follow on public offering completed in May 2015. Our strategy in undertaking the public offerings was to expand our proven ability to serve our rapidly growing markets by increasing our capital resources, enhancing our financial structuring flexibility, expanding the types of projects and end-customers we pursue, and selectively retaining a larger portion of the economics in the assets in which we invest. Prior to our IPO, we had traditionally financed our business by accessing the securitization market, primarily utilizing our relationships with institutional investors such as insurance companies and commercial banks. By utilizing the net proceeds from our offerings and our anticipated financing strategies, we intend to hold a significantly larger portion of the assets we originate on our balance sheet, using our own capital in conjunction with both securitizations and other borrowings. For further information on our public equity offerings, see “Note 11.” to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We expect to see, in comparison to historical periods, a much larger portion of our total revenue derived from net investment revenue and other recurring and predictable revenue sources. While we expect our investment interest expense to increase, we also expect that our net investment revenue, which represents the margin, or the difference between investment revenue and investment interest expense, will increase due to a higher average margin on a per asset basis as well as growth in the overall amount of our investments. We expect our average margin will increase as a result of increased use of equity in place of debt as well as lower anticipated interest rates on our borrowings.

In our securitization transactions, we transfer the transactions we originate to securitization trusts or other bankruptcy remote special purpose funding vehicles including to the Hannon Armstrong Multi-Asset Infrastructure Trust, or Hannie Mae. Large institutional investors, primarily insurance companies and commercial banks, historically provided the financing needed for a project by purchasing the notes issued by the trust or vehicle. The securitization market for the assets we finance remained active throughout the financial crisis due to investor demand for high credit quality, long-term investments. We typically arranged such securitizations of loans or other assets prior to originating the transaction and thus have avoided exposure to credit spread and interest rate risks that are normally associated with traditional capital markets conduit transactions. Additionally, we have typically avoided funding risks for these loans or other assets given that our securitization partners contractually agree to fund such assets before the origination transaction is completed.

In most cases, the transfer of loans or other assets to non-consolidated securitization trusts qualify as sales for accounting purposes. In these transactions, we record income as a gain on sale of receivables and investments. We also typically manage and service these assets in exchange for fees and other payments, which we record as fee income on our statement of operations. We may periodically provide other services, including arranging financings that are held on the balance sheet of other investors and advising various companies with respect to structuring investments.

We have completed approximately $167 million of transactions from January 1, 2015 to April 27, 2015, compared to approximately $132 million in the same period in 2014. We completed approximately $104 million of transactions during the quarter ended March 31, 2015, approximately 58% of which were added to our balance sheet and 42% were securitized or syndicated. We refer to the transactions that we hold on our balance sheet as our “Portfolio.” Our Portfolio may include:

- 27 -

Table of Contents

We began leasing real property to renewable projects in May 2014, when we acquired all of the outstanding member interests in AWCC. Through this acquisition and a series of follow on transactions, we own more than 12,500 acres of land that are under long-term lease agreements with over 20 solar projects, which we have recorded in our financial statements as real estate, and rights to payments from land leases for a diversified portfolio of 57 wind projects, which we have recorded in our financial statements as financing receivables. For further information on our real estate transactions, see Note 1 to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In October 2014, we invested approximately $144 million to acquire a portfolio of non-controlling equity investments in ten operating wind projects owned by an affiliate of JPMorgan. This transaction enables us to participate in the priority cash flows associated with these wind projects. We account for our investment in the wind projects as an equity method investment. As part of the transaction, we also borrowed $115 million of fixed-rate, amortizing non-recourse debt using the investment as collateral. For further information on these transactions, see Note 8 and Note 13 to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

As of March 31, 2015, our Portfolio was approximately $885 million. Approximately 70% of our Portfolio consisted of loans, financing receivables, direct financing leases or debt securities structured with fixed rates. Approximately 15% of our Portfolio was real estate with long-term leases and approximately 15% represented minority ownership of wind projects. Excluding our equity investments, approximately 46% of our Portfolio consisted of U.S. federal government or state or local government obligors, approximately 52% consisted of investment grade commercial obligations and 2% consisted of non-investment grade rated commercial obligations, in all cases rated either by an independent third party rating service or our internal credit rating system. In total, as of March 31, 2015, we managed approximately $2.6 billion of assets, which consisted of our Portfolio plus approximately $1.8 billion of assets held in non-consolidated securitization trusts. We refer to this $2.6 billion of assets collectively as our managed assets.

We have a large and active pipeline of potential new opportunities that are in various stages of our underwriting process. We refer to potential opportunities as being part of our pipeline if we have determined that the project fits within our investment strategy and exhibits the appropriate risk/reward characteristics through an initial credit analysis, including a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the opportunity, as well as research on the market and sponsor. Our pipeline of transactions that could potentially close over the next year consists of opportunities in which we will be the lead originator, as well as projects in which we may participate with other institutional investors. As of March 31, 2015, our pipeline consisted of more than $2.0 billion in new debt and equity opportunities. There can, however, be no assurance that any or all of the transactions in our pipeline will be completed.

Factors Impacting our Operating Results

We expect that our results of operations will be affected by a number of factors and will primarily depend on the size of our Portfolio, including the mix of transactions which we hold in our Portfolio, the income we receive from securitizations, syndications and other services, our Portfolio’s credit risk profile, changes in market interest rates, commodity prices, U.S. federal, state and/or municipal governmental policies, general market conditions in local, regional and national economies and our ability to qualify as a REIT and maintain our exception from registration as an investment company under the 1940 Act.

We have elected to qualify, and operate our business so as to qualify, to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2013. We believe that we have been organized and operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in such a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue

- 28 -

Table of Contents

Code. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on our ability to satisfy, among other requirements, certain asset and income tests, some of which depend upon the classification of at least 75% of the “fair market value” of our assets as real estate assets under the Internal Revenue Code. In May 2014, the United States Department of the Treasury published proposed regulations which, if adopted in the form proposed, would revise the definition of “real property” for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests. The proposed regulations are not yet in effect, and, depending upon whether and in what form they are actually adopted and how if adopted they are interpreted, may affect the classification of certain of our assets under these tests, and thus could require us to alter our mix of assets, adjust our approach to qualifying as a REIT or adjust our business strategy. The proposed regulations are proposed to be effective for calendar quarters beginning after they are published in final form. The Treasury has not indicated whether or when the proposed regulations will be finalized.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions that involve the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management judgment and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We provide a summary of our significant accounting policies under Note 2 in our 2014 Form 10-K and under Note 2 in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We have identified the following accounting policies as critical because they require significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our reported results of operations or financial condition. These critical accounting policies govern:

We evaluate our critical accounting estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and update them, as necessary, based on changing conditions.

We provide additional information on our critical accounting policies and use of estimates under “MD&A—Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” in our 2014 Form 10-K.

Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Our Portfolio

As of March 31, 2015, our Portfolio was approximately $885 million. Approximately 70% of our Portfolio consisted of loans, financing receivables, direct financing leases or debt securities structured with fixed rates. Approximately 15% of our Portfolio was real estate with long-term leases and approximately 15% represented

- 29 -

Table of Contents

minority ownership of wind projects. Excluding our equity investments, approximately 46% of our Portfolio consisted of U.S. federal government or state or local government obligors, approximately 52% consisted of investment grade commercial obligations and 2% consisted of non-investment grade rated commercial obligations, in all cases rated either by an independent third party rating service or our internal credit rating system. The weighted average remaining life of our Portfolio as of March 31, 2015, (excluding match-funded transactions) is approximately 13 years.

The following is an analysis of our Portfolio by type of obligor and credit quality as of March 31, 2015 with 98% of the debt and real estate portion of our Portfolio rated investment grade as shown below:

The table below provides details on the interest rate and maturity of our financing receivables and investments as of March 31, 2015:

- 30 -

Table of Contents

Our non-investment grade rated commercial obligations includes $14 million of senior secured debt securities in an operating wind project with a long-term power purchase agreement. The total outstanding balance of the debt securities is $61 million with the remaining portion owned by a large financial institution. As previously disclosed in our 2014 Form 10-K, an intercompany tax credit agreement was terminated when the parent company of the project was acquired by NRG Energy, Inc. The termination resulted in an event of default under the project financing arrangement. In addition, the trustee determined that an event of default arose in February 2015 from the borrower’s failure to deliver in February 2015 sufficient funds for allocation to future principal and interest payments. In April 2015, the trustee determined that, while the borrower had delivered sufficient funds to make the scheduled interest payment due in May 2015, an event of default arose from the borrower’s failure to deliver sufficient funds to make the full principal payment due on that date. The trustee has, however, confirmed that sufficient funds are held in reserve accounts for the project to enable the scheduled principal payment to be made in full. As a result, approximately $1.3 million of the approximately $5.2 million debt service reserve was used to fund the May 2015 principal payment. The holders of the senior secured debt securities remain in negotiations with the projects owners. In the event such negotiations are not resolved successfully the holders can exercise their rights of foreclosure in accordance with the terms of the project financing arrangement. Based on our evaluation of the cash flow model for the project, we have concluded that the debt securities are not impaired as of March 31, 2015.

As of March 31, 2015, we carried in commercial non-investment grade financing receivables an estimated recovery of $0.8 million on our EnergySource loan for which we established an allowance in 2013. In April 2015, we entered into an agreement where we agreed to allow EnergySource to borrow against a pending land sale from an unrelated third party in exchange for a $0.4 million cash payment and an agreement to receive an additional $0.4 million upon the closing of the land sale. Thus, we expect our recovery to equal the estimated recovery of $0.8 million. However, there can be no assurance as to the actual timing or ultimate recovery from any land sale or whether any land sale will in fact occur. Certain of our executive officers and directors own an indirect minority interest in EnergySource following the distribution of the Predecessor’s ownership interest prior to our IPO. For further information on the EnergySource loan, see Note 6 to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We had no other financing receivables, investments or leases on nonaccrual status as of March 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. We evaluate any modifications to our financing receivables in accordance with the guidance in ASC 310, Receivables. We evaluate modifications of financing receivables to determine if the modification is more than minor, whereby any related fees, such as prepayment fees, would be recognized as income at the time of the modification. We did not have any loan modifications that qualify as trouble debt restructurings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014.

The table below presents, for each major category of our Portfolio (excluding our equity method investment) and our interest-bearing liabilities, the average outstanding balances, investment income earned or interest expense incurred, and average yield or cost. Our net investment margin represents the difference between the yield on our portfolio (including our rental income) and the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities, including the impact of non-interest bearing funding, primarily equity. This analysis excludes the debt related to the equity investment in the wind projects because our earnings on the equity investment in the wind projects are not included in Investment Revenue.

- 31 -

Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of our anticipated principal repayments for our financing receivables and investments as of March 31, 2015:

For the anticipated maturity dates of our financing receivables and investments and the weighted average yield for each range of maturities as of March 31, 2015, see Note 6 to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Our real estate investments are rented under long term land lease agreements with expiration dates that range between 2033 and 2044 under the initial terms and 2047 and 2061 assuming expected extensions. For a schedule of our future minimum rental income under our land lease agreements as of March 31, 2015, see Note 6 to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

For information on our residual assets relating to our securitization trusts, see Note 3 to our financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The residual assets do not have a contractual maturity date and the underlying securitized assets have contractual maturity dates ranging from 2015 to 2038.

Results of Operation

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2014

- 32 -

Table of Contents

Net Income

Net income decreased by $0.7 million to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2014. Our equity method investment in the wind projects had a significant impact on the changes in operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015, when compared to the same period in 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recorded investment interest expense of $1.7 million related to the financing of our investment in the wind projects and recorded an equity method loss of $0.1 million. The results do not include the Non-GAAP Core Earnings adjustment related to recognizing income or loss based on the effective interest methodology in order to treat this investment in a manner similar to our other investments, which is discussed in the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below. The remaining decrease in net income was driven by higher Other Expenses, net of $2.8 million, primarily relate to an increase in compensation costs of $2.3 million, consisting primarily of equity-based compensation, and higher G&A expenses of $0.3 million, partially offset by an increase in Total Revenue, net of investment interest expense of $2.1 million, which consists primarily of growth in Investment Revenue of $4.9 million that was partially offset by an increase investment interest expenses of $2.6 million, in large part as a result of the $1.7 million of investment interest expenses related to the financing of our equity method investment in wind projects discussed above and higher borrowings under our credit facility used to finance growth in our Portfolio. See the discussion of our equity method investment in the wind projects in Note 13 of our financial statements and in our discussion of Core Earnings in the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below.

Net Investment Revenue

Net investment revenue increased to $4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015, from $2.4 million in the same period in 2014. The increase was driven primarily by an increase in our Portfolio of investments held during the three months ended March 31, 2015, when compared to the same period in 2014. The monthly average balance of our Portfolio increased to approximately $768 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015, from approximately $446 million in the same period in 2014. This increase in our Portfolio was driven by the acquisition of our real estate investments beginning in May 2014, which added approximately $116 million to the average monthly balance of our portfolio and $2.1 million in rental revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2015. In addition, our average monthly portfolio of financing receivables and investments increased by approximately $206 million due to our strategy to hold more originated transactions on our balance sheet. Revenue also increased due to the higher yield on our portfolio of investments in financing receivables and investments which increased to 5.3% from 5.2% when comparing the three months ended March 31, 2015, to the same period in 2014. This increase was driven primarily by an increase in the percentage of commercial projects in the Portfolio which have a higher yield than the governmental projects. Our larger Portfolio with higher yields resulted in $2.3 million increase in net investment revenue to $4.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $2.4 million during the same period in 2014.

As we have increased our leverage, the monthly average debt balance increased in the three months ended March 31, 2015, to approximately $527 million compared to approximately $344 million during the same period in 2014. Our average debt rate on these borrowings decreased to 3.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2015, from 4.1% for the same period ending March 31, 2014, due primarily to our higher utilization of the credit facility during the three months ended March 31, 2015, when compared to the same period in 2014. The higher average monthly debt balance was the primary driver of $0.9 million of the increase in our investment interest expense. The remaining increase in our investment interest expense of $1.7 million related to the $115 million of nonrecourse secured borrowings used to finance our equity method investment in wind projects.

As a result of the increase in the size of our Portfolio offset by an increase in the debt used to leverage the Portfolio, net investment revenue increased 96% to $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, from $2.4 million for the same period ended in 2014. Net investment revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015, includes the impact of the $1.7 million interest expense related to the financing of our equity method investment in the wind projects, whose earnings are not included in net investment revenue.

- 33 -

Table of Contents

Other Investment Revenue

Gain on sale of receivables and investments increased by $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, when compared to the same period ended March 31, 2014. The increase was the result of higher margins realized on transactions sold in the three months ended March 31, 2015 when compared to the same period in 2014. This increase was offset by a $1.1 million decline in fee income due to a loan syndication transaction recorded in fee income in 2014. As a result, other investment revenue decreased by $0.2 million to $3.1 million from $3.3 million in the same period last year.

Total Revenue, Net of Investment Interest Expense and Provision

Total revenue, net of investment interest expense and provision increased by $2.1 million to $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $5.7 million for the same period in 2014. This increase was primarily a result of the growth in our Portfolio across the periods compared.

Other Expenses, Net

Other expenses, net increased by $2.8 million to $5.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $2.9 million in the same period in 2014, primarily as a result of higher compensation and benefits costs of $2.3 million and $0.5 million of higher general and administrative and other expenses in 2015. The increase in compensation and benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2015, when compared to the same period in 2014, was driven primarily by higher performance based and service based stock compensation expenses as well as additional headcount. Beginning in April 2014, we granted performance based restricted stock awards and compensation expenses related to these awards are recorded based upon actual and expected achievement of certain performance targets as well as any service period.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our performance: (1) core earnings, (2) managed assets and (3) investment income from managed assets. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income or loss as measures of our operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly named financial measures as reported by other companies that do not define such terms exactly as we define such terms.

Core Earnings

We calculate Core Earnings as U.S. GAAP net income excluding non cash equity compensation expense, non cash provision for credit losses, amortization of intangibles, one time acquisition related costs, if any and any non cash tax charges. We also make an adjustment to account for our equity method investment in the wind projects on an effective interest method as described below. In the future, Core Earnings may also exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in U.S. GAAP and certain other non-cash charges as approved by a majority of our independent directors.

Our equity method investment in the wind projects is structured in a typical wind partnership “flip” structure where we, along with a number of other institutional investors, receive a pre-negotiated preferred return consisting of a priority distribution from the project cash flows along with tax attributes. Once this preferred return is achieved, the partnership flips and the project owner receives the majority of the cash flow with the institutional investors retaining an ongoing residual interest. Given this structure, we negotiated our purchase price of this investment based on our assessment of the expected cash flows from this investment discounted back to net present value based on a discount rate that represented an expected yield on the investment. This is similar to how we value the expected cash flows in financing receivables. Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to account for this investment utilizing a hypothetical liquidation at book value method (“HLBV”), in which we recognize income or loss based on the change in the amount each partner would receive if the assets were liquidated at book value, in this case, at the end of the immediately preceding quarter after adjusting for any distributions or contributions made during such quarter. As HLBV incorporates non-cash items, such as depreciation, and because we are entitled to receive a preferred return of cash flows on our investment independent of how profits and losses are allocated, the HLBV

- 34 -

Table of Contents

allocation does not, in our opinion, reflect the economics of our investment. As a result, and in an attempt to treat these investments in a manner similar to our other investments and our initial valuation, in calculating our Core Earnings, we adjusted the income we receive from this investment as if we were recognizing income or loss based on an effective interest methodology. Generally, under this methodology income is recognized over the life of the asset using a constant effective yield. The initial constant effective yield we selected is equal to the discount rate we used in making our investment decision. On at least a quarterly basis, we will review and, if appropriate, adjust this discount rate and the income or loss we receive from this investment for purposes of calculating our Core Earnings in future periods, as necessary, to reflect changes in both actual cash flows received and our estimates of the future cash flows from the projects. We borrowed $115 million on a nonrecourse basis using this $144 million equity method investment as collateral. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, we collected cash distribution from the wind investment of $6.3 million, of which $2.8 million represents our Core Earnings adjustment for this investment based upon the effective yield methodology discussed above. In addition, included in our U.S. GAAP investment interest expense was $1.7 million of interest expense related to the loan on this investment.

We believe that Core Earnings provides an additional measure of our core operating performance by eliminating the impact of certain non-cash expenses and facilitating a comparison of our financial results to those of other comparable REITs with fewer or no non-cash charges and comparison of our own operating results from period to period. Our management uses Core Earnings in this way. We believe that our investors also use Core Earnings, or a comparable supplemental performance measure, to evaluate and compare our performance to that of our peers, and as such, we believe that the disclosure of Core Earnings is useful to (and expected by) our investors.

However, Core Earnings does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP), or an indication of our cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP), a measure of our liquidity, or an indication of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, our methodology for calculating Core Earnings may differ from the methodologies employed by other REITs to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures, and accordingly, our reported Core Earnings may not be comparable to the core earnings reported by other REITs.

We have calculated our Core Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014. The table below provides a reconciliation of our U.S. GAAP net income to Core Earnings: